I have just watched without a doubt THE most disturbing episode of True Files yet. For the benefit of those who don't know what True Files is or didn't watch the episode i was referring to, True Files is a documentary series of some high profiles Singapore Criminal Cases. The episode i was more than disgusted by revolved around a mother who let a man rape her daughter for SIX years running.
Mother (mthr) tr.v.
For those who didn't watch the case, here are some details of the case. "Lucy" - her name was obviously changed in that episode to protect their identities - had been brought up in a tumultuous childhood, an abusive mother, served in a girls' home for more than a few occasions, grew up to meet useless abusive men who fathered her 3 children. Pei, was a friend of Lucy's husband, and at a point of time employed Lucy. After a while their relationship got intimate, although Lucy never broke relations with her husband. Pei claims he originally felt no lust for "Cindy" (Lucy's daughter), but over time as Cindy treated Pei as a father figure and snuggled and had close proximity with him, his lust grew. He started with molest and fondling, then moved on to more disgusting acts. He pestered Lucy to allow him to see Cindy nude, and after some persuasion, Lucy agreed. As we can probably expect, after a while he progressed to sex. Lucy not only had full knowledge of this, she not only allowed it, but she at times forced it upon Cindy to please Pei. For six years, when Cindy was at the age of NINE, Pei engaged in this everyday except weekends and public holidays. On more than one occasion, Lucy was called to join the fray, and looked on as Pei engaged in sex with her very own flesh and blood. When Cindy was 15, she heard that Lucy was finally in the process of divorcing her husband, and sought custody for all her children. Cindy did not want to be with her mother, and decided to report to the police.
With just words, i do believe people who didn't watch the episode are already more than disgusted enough. With the sensationalization that the show does, and the graphical images of the perversion of Pei, the cruelty of Lucy and the hopelessness Cindy felt, i personally felt compelled to add a new post almost so soon after my first post.
I have been brought up in an environment where a mother is someone who nurtures, protects and is a role model to her children. I have heard of less fortunate people who do not have this privilege in life, be in in terms of a divorce, a early discovery of how Heaven looks like, or just that their mothers somehow didn't fit the picture i painted. I have heard of mothers who sold their children into slavery or prostitution, in most cases that departure is a terrible and sad act, and in all these cases, this sacrifice was made to benefit the family as a whole, or was perceived to benefit. Never have i heard of such a situation where the mother lets someone she hoped to be the father figure for her children do such an act, much less willingly, even less that this "sacrifice" was for her own selfish, personal gain. I agree with the Judge's verdict with every fibre of my body, "..... allowing such a forsaken act take place with revolting frequency in the sanctuary of Home..." Of course, True Files wanted to sway us into Cindy's favor and showed the innocent girl sitting and sobbing on the staircase all alone. Everyday she has to make the difficult decision to come home from school, everyday she forces herself to accept the fact that her mother is actually the one who wants her to "provide" for him. Everyday the truth that she is not a normal child dawns on her, everyday she looks on at other parents who dote on their children whole-heartedly, everyday she envies orphans who never known parental love and hence never needed to experience the agony of having parents but no love.
There are many previously naturally assumed fundamentals that have been broken over time. Cohabitation is no longer too much of an issue, Pre-marital sex although still a hotly debated issue, the debate over it is signaling that there is an impetus of change for this issue. I personally cannot foresee the day when a father having sex with his daughter becomes not only morally justified, but a well accepted fact of society. Personally, pornography pales in comparison to this. To hell with the people who think pornography is an art form, pornography is sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal, art form or not i take no stand, but this? To me this is a complete turn off, so it definitely misses the pornographic goal post by a mile. The portrayal of pedophilia is a a form of pornography, it is outlawed in many countries, but if the girl willingly does it with the older man (i will not bring in the fact that the Courts rule that a girl under the statutory age is not in a position to judge), i will not question the male's slightly off-the-beaten-path tendencies. But doing it with a girl who considers you as almost a father figure? And the girl happens to be your loved one's (not mentioned in detail in the case, by we'll assume it) daughter?
As you can see this case has caused some tremendous adverse reactions in me. The rest of my day has been spoilt because of this, not to mention the fact that i have an International Economics test tomorrow morning and i haven't studied for it due to my recent workload (refer to previous post), probably also because i felt the 36yr jail term and 24 cane strokes Pei received was leaning on leniency, and Lucy received 36yrs as well because the Courts viewed Lucy as a key figure and not an unwitting pawn. I hope what the living world and the Law made by mortal men cannot take into account would be fully attended to by the Powers that Be, regardless of whatever religion they follow or my readers honor. Its basically euphemism for "I hope you burn in Hell".
How will Cindy ever learn to trust anyone? Being Buddhist myself, doctrine would say that whatever she gets now she accumulated the bad Karma over her past lives, all i can pray is that that 6 years of endless torment has more than paid for it, and that she, more than anyone else, deserves a better ending to this story. I have not had a chance to discuss this with my mum as of yet, as my mum takes a keen interest in Law cases, and i like discussing many issues with her as we take radically different point of views many a time. A slightly similar example would be the case when this young woman was raped, killed and burnt after being abducted from a car park in KL. I had tremendous pity for her, but no, my mum didn't share my views, and thinks she must've pissed someone off real bad to get into this predicament and goes on to claim why would a rapist want to burn the body after he's done with it if he wasn't out for revenge. We obviously had a decent quarrel over this matter, but i'd like to see what my mum would say THIS time. Oh did Cindy, a NINE YEAR OLD GIRL had it coming? Maybe she pissed off a classmate or a teacher in school? And the teacher paid Pei to rape her, otherwise how could u explain his voracious energy to be able to sustain DAILY raping sessions? And the teacher satisfied Lucy's needs so she didn't need Pei all the time, and in return Lucy would stand by and watch Cindy? Screw off mum, you and ur train of logic... i'd LOVE to hear what you have to disagree about this. What hurt me even more was the fact that after all that Lucy had done to her, Cindy still loved her, and was worried for her when she made the police report. If that isn't good Karma, i don't know what is.
We may have seen much less wars, some argue bloodshed, these past decades compared to earlier last century. But the way the world's going, i don't think its wars that are going to kill us, heck, aliens waging war on us don't even get a percentage in our possibility pie, we ourselves may ultimately seal our own doom. An ironic twist to "Our fate is in our own hands" perhaps? Maybe those people we call wackos standing around with large placards saying "Repent now, the Apocalypse is coming!" are right after all? Or am I just delirious? We'll see.
Dr@n|xX at 1:30 AM